BLOGS
Home / Blogs / RG58 Vs RG59 Vs RG6: A Comprehensive Guide To Antenna Coaxial Cables

RG58 Vs RG59 Vs RG6: A Comprehensive Guide To Antenna Coaxial Cables

Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2025-02-28      Origin: Site

facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
line sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button

Antenna coaxial cables are indispensable in connecting antennas to devices such as televisions, radios, and satellite systems. Among the myriad of coaxial cable types, RG58, RG59, and RG6 stand out for their specific roles in different applications. Each has certain qualities that make it perfect for a particular purpose. In this article, we’ll dive deep into their features, differences, and applications, providing you with all the knowledge you need to choose the right cable.

What Are Coaxial Cables and Why Are They Important?

A coaxial cable transmits high-frequency signals while minimizing interference and loss. Its design ensures signal integrity, making it essential for audio, video, and data transmission. Coaxial cables consist of four layers:


  • Inner Conductor: Transmits the electrical signal.

  • Dielectric Insulation: Prevents signal leakage and enhances signal strength.

  • Shielding: Protects the signal from electromagnetic interference (EMI).

  • Outer Jacket: Provides physical durability and protection.


Choosing the wrong type of coaxial cable can lead to degraded signal quality, higher loss, or even equipment incompatibility.


Introduction to RG58, RG59, and RG6

These cables are among the most commonly used types for antenna and signal transmission. Here’s an overview:


Specification

RG58

RG59

RG6

Impedance

50 Ohms

75 Ohms

75 Ohms

Diameter

~0.195 in

~0.242 in

~0.275 in

Frequency Range

Low

Medium

High

Applications

Radio, CB, Short-range

CCTV, Baseband Video

HDTV, Satellite, Long-range

Shielding

Single/Dual

Single/Dual

Quad/Dual

Loss over Distance

High

Medium

Low


Detailed Analysis of Each Cable Type

RG58 Cable

RG58 Coaxial Cable

Design and Features:
Because of their 50-Ohm impedance, RG58 cables are appropriate for communication and radio frequency (RF) applications. Their small diameter (~0.195 inches) provides excellent flexibility, making them easy to install in confined spaces.


Applications:


  • Commonly used in CB radios, amateur radio setups, and RF communication systems.

  • Suitable for short-range and low-frequency signal transmission.


Advantages:


  • Compact and flexible for easy installation.

  • Affordable and widely available.


Limitations:


  • Higher signal loss over long distances.

  • Less effective for high-frequency applications.

  • Limited shielding makes it less resistant to EMI.


RG59 Cable

RG59 Coaxial Cable

Design and Features:
RG59 cables are slightly thicker than RG58, with a 75-Ohm impedance optimized for video signal transmission. Because they work with legacy devices, they are frequently utilized in older analog systems.


Applications:


  • Ideal for CCTV systems, analog video, and low-bandwidth applications.

  • Common in baseband video and cable TV installations.


Advantages:


  • Affordable and sufficient for standard-definition video.

  • Moderate shielding provides reasonable EMI resistance.


Limitations:


  • Long-distance use is not recommended because to the increased signal attenuation compared to RG6.

  • Limited performance with modern, high-frequency applications like HDTV.


Important Distinctions Among RG58, RG59, and RG6

1. Impedance

  • Because of its 50-Ohm impedance, RG58 is perfect for radio frequency and communication systems.

  • With their 75-Ohm impedance, RG59 and RG6 are appropriate for high-frequency and video applications.

2. Signal Loss

  • RG58 experiences the highest signal loss over distance due to its smaller diameter.

  • RG59 offers moderate signal loss, acceptable for short to medium distances.

  • RG6 is designed to minimize signal attenuation, making it optimal for long-range use.

3. Shielding

  • RG58 typically has minimal shielding, limiting its EMI protection.

  • RG59 and RG6 provide better shielding options, with RG6 offering quad shielding for maximum interference resistance.

4. Frequency Handling

  • RG58 is limited to low-frequency applications.

  • RG59 performs well in medium frequencies, suitable for standard video.

  • RG6 supports high frequencies, ideal for modern HDTV and satellite systems.

5. Flexibility

  • Since RG58 is the most adaptable, routing in tight areas is simple.

  • RG59 strikes a balance between flexibility and performance.

  • RG6 is thicker and stiffer, but its performance outweighs this limitation in most high-frequency applications.



When to Use RG58, RG59, or RG6

Choose RG58 When:


  • Setting up amateur radios or CB radios.

  • Working with low-frequency RF signals.

  • Flexibility and compact cable size are critical.


Choose RG59 When:


  • Installing analog CCTV systems.

  • Transmitting baseband video signals.

  • Working within a limited budget for short-to-medium distance installations.


Choose RG6 When:


  • Setting up HDTV, satellite, or broadband internet systems.

  • Minimizing signal loss while operating long-distance cable installations.

  • EMI protection and high-frequency performance are essential.


Signal Loss Comparison


Below is a chart comparing signal loss over a 100-foot length for each cable type:


Frequency (MHz)

RG58 (dB)

RG59 (dB)

RG6 (dB)

50 MHz

6.0

3.4

1.5

200 MHz

16.0

8.0

4.0

500 MHz

32.0

16.5

8.0

1000 MHz

N/A

28.5

12.0


Installation Considerations

Cable Length

  • For short distances (under 50 feet), RG58 and RG59 are sufficient.

  • For long distances, RG6 is the clear winner due to its low attenuation.


Environmental Factors

  • RG6's robust shielding makes it more resistant to interference in urban or industrial settings.

  • RG58 and RG59 may suffice in less EMI-prone environments.


Connector Compatibility

  • Ensure your chosen cable type matches the connectors of your devices (e.g., BNC, F-type).


Cost Comparison

  • RG58 is the most affordable option but may not meet the needs of high-performance systems.

  • RG59 offers a balance of cost and performance, suitable for many legacy systems.

  • RG6 is the most expensive but justifies the cost with its superior performance.



Conclusion


Your unique needs will determine which coaxial cable is best for your antenna installation. RG58 is suitable for short-range, low-frequency applications where flexibility is a priority. RG59 works well for legacy video systems, while RG6 is the go-to choice for modern, high-frequency systems like HDTV and broadband internet.


Your antenna arrangement will operate at its best and be the most economical if you are aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each cable type.








NAVIGATION

PRODUCTS

CONTACT US
E-mail: czchenguang@vip.163.com
E-mail: ivy.song@dawndn.com
E-mail: jenny.li@dawndn.com
Add: C2-Building Hutang Science&Tech Industrial park, Changzhou City,Jiangsu Province,China

LEAVE A MESSAGE

Copyright 2017 © Changzhou Dawn Electronic Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. Sitemap